"BP has not met the EPA's mandate that it switch to a new dispersant, saying there aren't any other viable options for the Gulf oil spill. But the EPA says it's 'not satisfied,' and the manufacturer of a different dispersant insists it can meet BP's needs." Mark Guarino reports for the Christian Science Monitor May 25, 2010.
Search
Categories
- Activism
- Beaches
- BP
- Cleanup
- Containment
- Criminal
- Dispersants
- Drilling Policy
- Explosion and Rescue
- Failure Sequence
- Fisheries/Seafood
- Flow Rate
- Health Impacts
- Hearings
- Human Impacts
- Legislation
- Liability Claims
- Media/Transparency
- Oil Elsewhere
- Oil Markets
- Oil Movement
- Political Fallout
- Pollution
- Recovery
- Science
- Tourism
- Transocean
- Waterbirds
- Wetlands
- White House
- Wildlife
« "U.S. Declares Fishery Disaster In 3 Gulf States" | Main | Latest Spill Map from "Unified Command" »
05/25/2010
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
News Media Sources
Government Sources
- Gulf Fishery Mgmt. Council
- BOEMRE (MMS) Response
- Interior Dept. Response
- La. DWF Spill Response
- Energy Dept. Response
- NOAA Fisheries - SE Region
- USGS Response
- FWS Response
- White House Blog
- Alabama Spill Information
- Louisiana Emergency Response
- NOAA Trajectory Forecasts
- NOAA Response
- EPA Response
- Coast Guard Response
Comments